FAQ: Getting Indexed, Traffic Bug and A Bastion Of BS

February 19, 2010SEO tips
4

Here is a commonly asked question:

Do I need an indexing tool or software like Traffic Bug to get my website indexed by the Search Engines?

In the Thirty Day Challenge, a popular internet marketing course , a tool called Traffic Bug is recommended to facilitate fast indexing of webpages. Traffic Bug claims to do many things, but basically is aimed to automate a host of activities internet marketers want to perform, like social bookmarking, article submission, rss submissions and more. It does so by submitting your articles and information to a wide array of social networks and directories automatically and cuts out the time needed to create individual profiles and perform manual submissions for each website.

While the Traffic Bug website claims to build your website back links on autopilot, which has been a hotly debated promise in itself, the Thirty Day Challenge Team lead by Ed Dale encourages the use of traffic bug simply as an ‘Indexing Tool’.

The theory is, if you make enough noise on a number of websites, you will get noticed quickly and Google & co will index your website fast.

But really, do we need a solution like Traffic Bug just to get our websites indexed? Do we need a sophisticated automation tool that sends out our content to a massive array of websites, just to get noticed by Google? And do we need to pay for a tool like this?

Do we need all this noise, just to get a page indexed?

Answer: NO

Saying otherwise is a ‘Bastion Of Bullshit’. Sorry Ed Dale.

It’s really dead easy to get indexed and found by Google if you have a brand new website. You can cough and your site will get found. All it really takes is a one decent link pointing to your website from a place that is already indexed and that gets crawled regularly.  In half the time it takes to enter your information into a tool like traffic bug, you could have placed a link on the web which would have done the same job with a great deal more elegance, without having to get close to the grey area of spam – which a tool like Traffic Bug is easily abused for.

So why does Internet Millionaire and Internet Marketing Guru Ed Dale and his loyal 30DC crew promote Traffic Bug as an indexing tool?

I have NO IDEA.

And I have no idea why they endorse Traffic Bug despite an obvious trail of legitimate misgivings around the service. All I know that it makes them look foolish and it definitely helps confuse internet marketing beginners.

There a dozens and dozens of better, cheaper and faster ways to get indexed than Traffic Bug (here are a few great ones), save yourself the time, money and the risk of getting your site noticed in negative ways. You don’t need ‘special tools’ to get your webpages indexed.

  1. Karl Hummel says:

    Hi,

    Great post. I use Traffic Bug regularly and have found it to be quite helpful. I find that it has saved me a lot of time and although I have no way of proving that each post this software claims to make for me actually takes place, I do believe a good majority of them do get made.

    I’m not really concerned with getting my webpages indexed because as you said that is very easy to do. But I feel that the more quality backlinks it produces for me, the better off I am. I regularly get about 50 new backlinks a day from my postings with this software so I figure that even if only half off them stick that’s 25 posts that i did not have to make. So for me it is worth the money.

    I have posted a video on my blog, showing the results I’ve experienced from Traffic bug as of the middle of February. I do respect your opinion on this matter though, and will keep it in mind as time goes on and I monitor my Page Rank and the registered backlinks to my web properties.

    To Your Continued Success!

    Karl

  2. Get this. I just saw a video on youtube, for the 30 Day Challenge, 2010.
    They’re still promoting Traffic Bug!

    What the hell is wrong with Ed Dale? I think he’s loosing the plot. Why after the complete failure of Traffic Bug last year, would he again choose to promote it?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mrihs2Vb1D0

    Check out the video… i’ve never heard so much BS in my whole life. A Simple sitemap.xml file, submitted to webmaster tools, with a simple ping list gets my websites indexed within 2 days on the first ping, and then within 10 minutes for each new page created.

    I cannot fathom why they are spreading so much BS about this. You don’t need traffic bug! It’s a total unneccesary service (& could potentially cause ranking problems – google’s algo looks at links vs visitors over time, and any site getting a bunch of links before visitors could potentially be ranked poorly)

    *Shakes Head*

  3. admin says:

    I noticed that too, it is just stunning to me. It reflects very poorly on Ed Dale & co, but what can you do (apart from call it out). Their new format really doesn’t require overnight indexing either, why not just spend some time getting one quality/legitimate link to get a site indexed instead.

    I’m not sure Google officially incorporates traffic/visitors numbers in their ranking algorithm, they have stated they don’t incorporate google analytics data on a number of occasions for a number of reasons. But as far as detecting spam – it is not hard to identify patterns. Issue being with Traffic Bug in the past (not sure how it stands today) is the whole idea of spreading low quality links in mass is just a daft tactic. It gives off all the wrong signals. Not to mention most of the links disappear sooner or later. Wasted energy.

  4. Yes, and absolutely not needed to get indexed!

    Google uses their toolbar, and search engine result activity to track where visitors go, bounce rates, time on site, etc.

    So… lots of links to a site that no one has visited… results in the links being ineffective. On all my sites with steady flow of visitors over time rankings have slowly increased, a steady incline. I recon the algo takes into account links vs visitors…

    Thanks for commenting on my music video!

    http://anthonywakefield.com.au/centering-in-improvised-acoustic-guitar-song-in-layers/

    Anthony.

Leave a Reply